Hackathon launches June 11 · · Register now →
Tracks  /  Accountability & Justice
Track 3 · Challenge

Accountability & Justice.

Help organize evidence, strengthen legal work, and improve accountability.

1.Victim Protection & Record-Sealing Navigator

Survivors of trafficking face long-term harm when public records, court documents, criminal history, or identifying information expose their past victimization or create barriers to housing, employment, safety, and recovery. Build an AI-assisted tool that helps legal aid teams, advocates, or eligible survivors understand victim-protection pathways, record-sealing options, required documents, and next steps.

Start here — A plain-language assistant that explains victim-protection or record-sealing options from a small set of uploaded legal resources.

Push further — Add jurisdiction-specific comparison, eligibility triage, document preparation checklists, and referral pathways to legal aid.

Helps survivors, legal aid organizations, victim advocates, court navigators, public defenders  ·  Uses legal RAG, eligibility screening, plain-language legal explanation, citation-aware search  ·  Demo: a user asks "what options might a trafficking survivor have to protect their records?" and gets the general pathway, source citations, and a next-step checklist.

2.Evidence Timeline & Case Preparation Builder

Trafficking-related cases involve scattered documents, screenshots, messages, financial records, travel details, dates, locations, and witness information. Legal and advocacy teams need better ways to organize information without losing context or exposing sensitive data. Build a tool that organizes scattered records into a searchable case timeline for legal, investigative, or advocacy teams.

Start here — Upload a few sample documents and generate a basic timeline of events.

Push further — Cross-reference people, dates, locations, organizations, payments, messages, and evidence gaps while redacting sensitive information.

Helps legal aid teams, investigators, prosecutors, advocates, survivor-serving organizations  ·  Uses document AI, timeline extraction, entity recognition, evidence tagging, privacy redaction  ·  Demo: scattered records transformed into a structured case timeline with key dates, people, locations, and missing-evidence flags.

3.Public-Sector AI Accountability Review Tool

Government agencies increasingly use AI in high-impact areas — victim services, case management, investigations, public benefits, fraud detection, resource allocation. These systems need transparency, human oversight, privacy protection, and safeguards against harmful or unfair outcomes. Build a review tool that helps agencies, policymakers, or watchdog groups evaluate whether an AI system is being used responsibly in a public-sector or justice-related context.

Start here — A questionnaire that scores an AI system on transparency, privacy, human oversight, safety, explainability, and appeal mechanisms.

Push further — Map the system against a governance framework, generate a risk report, identify missing safeguards, and recommend controls before deployment.

Helps state and local agencies, policymakers, public-interest organizations, oversight bodies  ·  Uses AI risk assessment, policy checklist generation, impact assessment, bias-risk screening  ·  Demo: analyze a fictional government AI used for case prioritization and generate a responsible-use report with risk level, gaps, and recommended governance steps.

4.Incident Pattern & Accountability Gap Dashboard

Anonymized reports, hotline summaries, service-provider notes, public records, corporate modern slavery statements, and supply-chain reports contain patterns that are hard to detect manually. Policymakers, advocates, and service providers need better visibility into where prevention, enforcement, victim services, or corporate accountability are falling short. Build a dashboard that surfaces patterns, trends, service gaps, weak commitments, and policy opportunities.

Start here — Analyze sample reports or corporate modern slavery statements and categorize key issues, missing commitments, vague language, and accountability gaps.

Push further — Compare multiple regions, agencies, or companies to identify recurring gaps in enforcement, victim services, due diligence, or public reporting.

Helps legislators, public agencies, NGOs, researchers, legal teams, journalists, procurement teams  ·  Uses structured extraction, clustering, trend detection, corporate statement analysis, compliance scoring  ·  Demo: a dashboard that reveals emerging patterns across anonymized reports and public accountability documents, then recommends where attention is needed.

Not feeling these? Combine ideas, adapt to your local context, or propose a completely new solution within this track. A focused prototype that works beats an ambitious idea that stays abstract.

Ready to build? Register now  ·  Join our Discord  ·  Submissions close July 9, 2026.

← Back to all tracks